This ordered spine follows Workbook Standard v2 §23.2 and the October template across the existing sprint. It is a route to the teaching and evidence, not fifteen extra tasks in every class.
Sprint Cover
Who benefits when a feed optimizes attention? Builds on Week 5 ranking and identity/data flows. New learning: how objectives and feedback redistribute visibility, then how evidence supports judgement. Prepares for d07 source synthesis and later changed-rule transfer.
Open this part of the learningRetrieval / Prior Knowledge
First use memory; then correct and preserve the first version. Retrieve input/rule/output, a missing-data distinction and an older identity-flow idea. The delayed returns are named in the chapter review.
Open this part of the learningChapter / Content Teaching
Review 3.1H/start 3.1I pp. 72–74; 3.2E pp. 86–89; 4.2A/B pp. 213–219. Retrieve algorithm representations/components pp. 81–85.
Open this part of the learningTechnology Mechanism
Trace input, condition, loop, ranking, output and feedback; identify a human objective, control point and uncertainty. Explain a record before judging a consequence.
Open this part of the learningReal-World Case + Evidence
Bounded TikTok, EU investigation, YouTube policy and ILO labour source set. Complete A/C passports with exact locators and legitimate usefulness; no finished judgement is supplied.
Open this part of the learningPractical / Simulation / Investigation
Predict by hand, change one variable, test, observe, explain, challenge and transfer. Trace Lab, Tune the Feed and Roundtable use separate synthetic cases.
Open this part of the learningStakeholders + 3Cs
Compare a user and creator or worker: goal, influence, supported benefit/risk. Choose a concept; identify the technical content and context that change the consequence.
Open this part of the learningImpact → Implication
Choose creator income or cultural visibility. Explain the intermediate operation, a supported immediate impact and why it matters under conditions.
Open this part of the learningCounter-Perspective + Trade-Off
Choose the strongest credible challenge to your priority. Weigh relevance, discovery, control, opportunity and risk; justify whose priorities matter and revise your judgement.
Open this part of the learningPaper 1 Practice
Knowledge /6, application /6 and later evaluation /8 prompts; Thursday’s original paragraph separately formative. Use task-specific feedback, never a blanket IA rubric.
Open this part of the learningPaper 2 Synthesis
A/C: identify /2, explain /4 and directly compare /6 during Friday inquiry. Integrate sources and knowledge in the /12 prompt later in d07.
Open this part of the learningIndependent Transfer
Monday’s teacher-held Sprint 2 retry after feedback is attempt 2 under its original task /8. Tuesday numerical mover, Wednesday changed exposure rule and Friday new music-feed consequence check are formative. Later d08 retains its existing scored transfer.
Open this part of the learningDefence
Teacher conversation asks which operation or evidence supports a choice. Friday defend the weakest link in your chain; later d09 keeps its fuller rule defence. O/C/P opportunities are not automatically achievement.
Open this part of the learningRetrieval + Next Step
Preserve initial work, receive one evidence-linked action, practise it, then check a fresh case. Friday applies Thursday’s feedback; next d07 recalls the loop and a source limit.
Open this part of the learningIA Connection
Page 89 source usefulness connects to inquiry habits: can this source answer this question? Choose one unresolved question and missing type of evidence in reflection. This is preparation, with 0 formal IA minutes and no IA criteria awarded this week.
Open this part of the learning