IB DIGITAL SOCIETY — FOUR LENSES → CRITERION B

Name:
Date:
Current IA inquiry question:

PART 1 — TED TALK + FOUR LENSES

Source: Joy Buolamwini, “How to protect your rights in the age of AI,” TEDAI, October 2023.

IDENTITY
How can the system represent, classify or misrepresent a person?

POWER
Who can design, deploy, regulate or challenge the system? Who has less power?

SYSTEMS
Trace one chain: data → model → output → human/institutional decision → consequence.
Which people, rules or organizations are also involved?

VALUES & ETHICS
Which two defensible values or rights are in tension? Explain the conflict.

EVIDENCE
One important claim:
Timestamp or example that supports it:
One limitation of the talk as evidence:
One causal connection between at least two lenses:

INFOGRAPHIC CHECK
File name or Drive link:
One fact, label or relationship I checked:
One content or design decision I made myself:


PART 2 — MY CURRENT IA SOURCE INVENTORY

For each candidate, judge: Strong / Workable / Weak.

CANDIDATE 1
Short title / author:
Citation or URL:
Direct relevance:
Credibility and currentness:
Usable claims or evidence:
Perspective represented / absent:
Usefulness for later analysis:
Risk or limitation:
Decision — KEEP / MAYBE / DROP:

CANDIDATE 2
Short title / author:
Citation or URL:
Direct relevance:
Credibility and currentness:
Usable claims or evidence:
Perspective represented / absent:
Usefulness for later analysis:
Risk or limitation:
Decision — KEEP / MAYBE / DROP:

CANDIDATE 3
Short title / author:
Citation or URL:
Direct relevance:
Credibility and currentness:
Usable claims or evidence:
Perspective represented / absent:
Usefulness for later analysis:
Risk or limitation:
Decision — KEEP / MAYBE / DROP:

ADDITIONAL CANDIDATES
Repeat the same headings for every other serious source you have already found.


PART 3 — MY PROVISIONAL TOP THREE

SOURCE 1
Complete source and citation:
Strongest claim, finding or evidence for my inquiry:
Perspective or stakeholder represented:
Credibility basis and whether its date matters:
Exact use in my later analysis or multimedia presentation:
What another source must corroborate, qualify, challenge or add:

SOURCE 2
Complete source and citation:
Strongest claim, finding or evidence for my inquiry:
Perspective or stakeholder represented:
Credibility basis and whether its date matters:
Exact use in my later analysis or multimedia presentation:
What another source must corroborate, qualify, challenge or add:

SOURCE 3 — OR LEAVE OPEN AND DEFINE THE SEARCH GAP
Complete source and citation:
Strongest claim, finding or evidence for my inquiry:
Perspective or stakeholder represented:
Credibility basis and whether its date matters:
Exact use in my later analysis or multimedia presentation:
What another source must corroborate, qualify, challenge or add:

If this slot is open, what exact evidence, expertise or perspective is missing?
Targeted search terms:


PART 4 — WHOLE-SET BALANCE

Do all three make the same argument or represent the same perspective?
Which important stakeholder or consequence is still missing?
Are all three the same source type or organization type?
Is any source only general background?
How can the set support analysis of impacts, implications and tensions?

SET VERDICT — STRONG / WORKABLE / REPLACE ONE / REBUILD SOURCE SET:
One source I will definitely keep:
One source I may drop or question:
One next action:

AI BOUNDARY
Gemini may organize the four-lens study infographic from my own notes. It may not choose, summarize, rank or justify my IA sources or write Criterion B for me.